Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition) (Jul 2016)

The Mexican consensus on irritable bowel syndrome

  • R. Carmona-Sánchez,
  • M.E. Icaza-Chávez,
  • M.V. Bielsa-Fernández,
  • O. Gómez-Escudero,
  • F. Bosques-Padilla,
  • E. Coss-Adame,
  • F. Esquivel-Ayanegui,
  • Á.R. Flores-Rendón,
  • M.A. González-Martínez,
  • F. Huerta-Iga,
  • A. López-Colombo,
  • T.H. Méndez-Gutiérrez,
  • A. Noble-Lugo,
  • J.R. Nogueira-de Rojas,
  • R.H. Raña-Garibay,
  • J.M. Remes-Troche,
  • F. Roesch-Dietlen,
  • M.J. Schmulson,
  • J.C. Soto-Pérez,
  • J.L. Tamayo,
  • L.F. Uscanga,
  • M.Á. Valdovinos,
  • J. Valerio-Ureña,
  • M.R. Zavala-Solares

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmxen.2016.01.004
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 81, no. 3
pp. 149 – 167

Abstract

Read online

Background: Since the publication in 2009 of the Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome of the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (2009 Guidelines), there have been significant advances in our knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease. Aims: To present a consensus review of the most current knowledge of IBS, updating the 2009 Guidelines by incorporating new internationally published scientific evidence, with a special interest in Mexican studies. Methods: The PubMed literature from January 2009 to March 2015 was reviewed and complemented through a manual search. Articles in English and Spanish were included and preference was given to consensuses, guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Statements referring to the different aspects of the disease were formulated and voted upon by 24 gastroenterologists employing the Delphi method. Once a consensus on each statement was reached, the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation were determined through the GRADE system. Results: Forty-eight statements were formulated, updating the information on IBS and adding the complementary data that did not appear in the 2009 Guidelines regarding the importance of exercise and diet, diagnostic strategies, and current therapy alternatives that were analyzed with more stringent scientific vigor or that emerged within the last 5 years. Conclusions: We present herein a consensus review of the most relevant advances in the study of IBS, updating and complementing the 2009 Guidelines. Several studies conducted in Mexico were included.

Keywords