Prioritization of the Social Approach of Employment Modeled by Plithogenic Sets

Abstract

Employment can only be understood from different approaches, such as the social, economic, and legal approach. To model employment using logic, it is necessary to take into account that these approaches are usually modeled with different logics, e.g., legality is modeled using deontic logic. Furthermore, each of these approaches intrinsically contains indeterminacy. This paper proposes to use plithogenic sets to combine the different logics used to model employment approaches that also include indeterminacy. This idea responds to the definition of Plithogeny as the concept that combines dissimilar entities of different origin to form new entities as a result of their contradictory or non-contradictory interactions. In this article, the social approach is used as the most important attribute within the plithogenic sets. Although plithogenic sets have been used successfully in solving decision-making problems, as far as the authors know, they had never been used to combine different logics on the same concept. Specifically, we link the neutrosophic modal logic in particular neutrosophic deontic modality to describe the social and legal approaches with neutrosophic logic to describe the economic and political approaches.

Keywords

• employment
• social sciences
• plithogeny
• plithogenic sets
• neutrosophic modal logic
• neutrosophic deontic modality