Metabarcoding and Metagenomics (Feb 2022)

Comparing PCR-generated artifacts of different polymerases for improved accuracy of DNA metabarcoding

  • Satoshi Nagai,
  • Sirje Sildever,
  • Noriko Nishi,
  • Satoshi Tazawa,
  • Leila Basti,
  • Takanori Kobayashi,
  • Yoshizumi Ishino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.6.77704
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6
pp. 27 – 39

Abstract

Read online Read online Read online

Accuracy of PCR amplification is vital for obtaining reliable amplicon-sequencing results by metabarcoding. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of error profiles in the PCR products by 14 different PCR kits using a mock eukaryotic community DNA sample mimicking metabarcoding analysis. To prepare a mock eukaryotic community from the marine environment, equal amounts of plasmid DNA from 40 microalgal species were mixed and used for amplicon-sequencing by a high-throughput sequencing approach. To compare the differences in PCR kits used for this experiment, we focused on the following seven parameters: 1) Quality, 2) Chimera, 3) Blast top hit accuracy, 4) Deletion, 5) Insertion, 6) Base substitution and 7) Amplification bias amongst species. The results showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) for all of the seven parameters depending on the PCR kits used. These differences may result from the different DNA polymerases included in each kit, although the result can also be influenced by PCR reaction conditions. Simultaneous analysis of several parameters suggested that kits containing KOD plus Neo (TOYOBO) and HotStart Taq DNA polymerase (BiONEER, CA, US) at the annealing temperature of 65 °C displayed better results in terms of parameters associated with chimeras, top hit similarity and deletions.