Prevalence of Serous Macular Detachment in Recurrent Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

Abstract

Objectives:To evaluate the prevalence of serous macular detachment (SMD) accompanying recurrent cystoid macular edema (CME) in patients initially treated for CME secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) with accompanying SMD, and discuss the factors that affect the prevalence.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 71 patients with RVO-associated CME and SMD who achieved complete anatomical resolution after treatment with either a single dexamethasone implant or three loading doses of ranibizumab and developed recurrent CME during follow-up.Results:Initial treatment was a single intravitreal dexamethasone implant in 45 patients (63.4%) (Group 1) and three loading doses of intravitreal ranibizumab in 26 patients (36.6%) (Group 2). The mean time to CME recurrence was 4.7±0.8 months (range, 4-7 months) and was similar in both groups (p=0.984). At the time of CME recurrence, SMD was present in 41 patients (57.7%) and absent in 30 patients (42.3%). SMD was present in 27 (60.0%) of the 45 Group 1 patients and 14 (53.8%) of the 26 Group 2 patients (p=0.613). SMD was present in 48.8% of branch RVO and 71.4% of central RVO patients at the time of recurrence (p<0.001).Conclusion:SMD accompanied recurrent CME in only 57.7% of patients previously treated for CME and SMD and seems to be more frequent in patients with central RVO. Initial intravitreal treatment choice of either ranibizumab or dexamethasone implant did not affect the prevalence of concurrent SMD in patients with recurrent CME.

Keywords

• cystoid macular edema
• optical coherence tomography
• serous macular detachment
• branch retinal vein occlusion
• central retinal vein occlusion