The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2024)

Many Roads Lead to Lithium: Formation Pathways For Lithium-rich Red Giants

  • Maryum Sayeed,
  • Melissa K. Ness,
  • Benjamin T. Montet,
  • Matteo Cantiello,
  • Andrew R. Casey,
  • Sven Buder,
  • Megan Bedell,
  • Katelyn Breivik,
  • Brian D. Metzger,
  • Sarah L. Martell,
  • Leah McGee-Gold

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1936
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 964, no. 1
p. 42

Abstract

Read online

Stellar models predict that lithium (Li) inside a star is destroyed during the first dredge-up phase, yet 1.2% of red giant stars are Li-rich. We aim to uncover possible origins of this population, by analyzing 1099 Li-rich giants ( A (Li) ≥ 1.5) in GALAH DR3. To expose peculiar traits of Li-rich stars, we construct a reference sample of Li-normal (doppelgänger) stars with matched evolutionary state and fiducial iron-peak and alpha-process abundances ([Fe/H] and [Mg/Fe]). Comparing Li-rich and doppelgänger spectra reveals systematic differences in the H α and Ca-triplet line profiles associated with the velocity broadening measurement. We also find twice as many Li-rich stars appear to be fast rotators (2% with v _broad ≳ 20 km s ^−1 ) compared to doppelgängers. On average, Li-rich stars have higher abundances than their doppelgängers, for a subset of elements, and Li-rich stars at the base of RGB have higher mean s -process abundances (≥0.05 dex for Ba, Y, Zr), relative to their doppelgängers. External mass-transfer from intermediate -mass AGB companions could explain this signature. Additional companion analysis excludes binaries with mass ratios ≳0.5 at ≳7 au. Finally, we confirm a prevalence of Li-rich stars on the red clump that increases with lithium, which supports an evolutionary state mechanism for Li-enhancement. Multiple culprits, including binary spin-up and mass-transfer, are therefore likely mechanisms of Li-enrichment.

Keywords