The utility of intraoperative nerve monitoring in secondary and tertiary Hyperparathyroid surgery

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a well‐known complication of parathyroid surgery. Despite ample data, there is still uncertainty about the role of intraoperative monitoring (IONM) in mitigating RLN damage. Study Design A retrospective review. Methods We included all patients presenting for total, subtotal, or completion parathyroidectomy at a tertiary referral hospital from 2013 to 2018. Information about demographics, previous neck surgery, perioperative data, pathology, and possible RLN injury was collected. Two groups were formed for analysis: IONM vs. nonmonitored (NM). Results 105 patients underwent 107 surgeries with IONM utilized in 71 cases. The groups were similar in demographics, but significantly differed (all P < 0.05) in preincision parathyroid hormone level (IONM = 2091.44 vs NM = 1334.87), surgery type (IONM = 62.9% vs NM = 27.8% subtotal), and surgery length in minutes (IONM = 155.21 vs NM = 182.22). We observed six cases (6/71 = 8.45%) of persistent RLN complaints (three or more weeks postoperatively) and four cases (4/71 = 5.63%) of temporary complaints with the use of IONM compared with only one temporary complaint (1/36 = 2.78%) in unmonitored procedures (P = 0.129). Conclusions These results suggest that the use of IONM does not provide a protective effect on the RLN in patients with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism undergoing total, subtotal, or completion parathyroidectomy. Prospective, randomized studies with pre‐ and postoperative flexible laryngoscopy are needed to explore the use of IONM in this patient population further.

Keywords

• anatomy
• monitoring
• parathyroid
• recurrent laryngeal nerve
• surgery