Understanding Physician and Patient Preferences for Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Endovascular Thrombectomy

Abstract

Background In light of evidence from recent trials that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone may potentially be noninferior to combined treatment, that is, with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase and EVT, we sought to understand physician and patient preferences around this issue. Methods We conducted a 2‐stage mixed methods study that included a structured, international, web‐based cross‐sectional survey among stroke physicians, and a focus group involving stroke survivors and caregivers. Demographic information was collected from all participants. The survey offered multiple choice questions and options to respond via free text which was analyzed quantitatively. The focus group was conducted online and analyzed qualitatively using a grounded theory approach. Results A total of 225 physicians (67% men) from 44 countries completed the survey. Most participants (70%) were between 31 and 50 years of age. Survey results showed that in current practice, 90% respondents would offer IVT to patients with large vessel occlusion stroke eligible for both IVT and EVT. When asked if their practice would change in light of recent trials, 63% responded no. When asked about the appropriate timing for IVT in the setting of large vessel occlusion stroke with EVT availability, 56% preferred to administer IVT immediately, 21% were willing to defer the decision for 30 minutes from groin puncture, and 8% were willing to defer for 60 minutes from groin puncture to assess if reperfusion was achieved with EVT. A total of 61% participants would choose to use tenecteplase over alteplase as the preferred drug for IVT if both drugs are backed by evidence. The focus group identified a need to better understand patient characteristics that may benefit from EVT‐only or combined strategies. The focus group also identified the need for more data to inform physician decision making. Conclusions Most physicians surveyed prefer IVT before EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to large vessel occlusion, although there was some uncertainty around this issue. The need for further studies, including data on IVT with tenecteplase and among various patient subgroups to inform decision making, was apparent from both the survey and the patient focus group.

Keywords

• acute ischemic stroke
• bridging therapy
• direct endovascular therapy
• focus group
• mixed methods study
• survey