Journal of Clinical Medicine (Apr 2023)

Oral Sodium Chloride in the Prevention of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Elderly Outpatients: The PNIC-Na Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

  • Cecilia Suárez Carantoña,
  • Carlos Escobar Cervantes,
  • Martín Fabregate,
  • Mónica López Rodríguez,
  • Nuria Bara Ledesma,
  • Javier Soto Pérez-Olivares,
  • Raúl Antonio Ruiz Ortega,
  • Genoveva López Castellanos,
  • Andreina Olavarría Delgado,
  • Javier Blázquez Sánchez,
  • Vicente Gómez del Olmo,
  • Myriam Moralejo Martín,
  • María Belén Pumares Álvarez,
  • María de la Concepción Sánchez Gallego,
  • Pau Llàcer,
  • Fernando Liaño,
  • Luis Manzano

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082965
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 8
p. 2965

Abstract

Read online

Objective: We aimed to test the non-inferiority of oral versus intravenous hydration in the incidence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) in elderly outpatients undergoing a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scan. Methods: PNIC-Na (NCT03476460) is a phase-2, single-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. We included outpatients undergoing a CE-CT scan, >65 years having at least one risk factor for CA-AKI, such as diabetes, heart failure, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m². Participants were randomized (1:1) to oral sodium-chloride capsules or intravenous hydration. The primary outcome was an increase in serum creatinine >0.3 mg/dL or a reduction in eGFR >25% within 48 h. The non-inferiority margin was set at 5%. Results: A total of 271 subjects (mean age 74 years, 66% male) were randomized, and 252 were considered for the main analysis (per-protocol). A total of 123 received oral hydration and 129 intravenous. CA-AKI occurred in 9 (3.6%) of 252 patients and 5/123 (4.1%) in the oral-hydration group vs. 4/129 (3.1%) in the intravenous-hydration group. The absolute difference between the groups was 1.0% (95% CI −4.8% to 7.0%), and the upper limit of the 95% CI exceeded the pre-established non-inferiority margin. No major safety concerns were observed. Conclusion: The incidence of CA-AKI was lower than expected. Although both regimens showed similar incidences of CA-AKI, the non-inferiority was not shown.

Keywords