Frontiers in Pharmacology (Aug 2024)

Indications and adverse events of teriparatide: based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

  • Ming-Tao Wen,
  • Jia-Cheng Li,
  • Jia-Cheng Li,
  • Bo-Wen Lu,
  • Hua-Rong Shao,
  • Pei-Xue Ling,
  • Fei Liu,
  • Fei Liu,
  • Gang Li,
  • Gang Li,
  • Di Luo,
  • Di Luo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1391356
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundTeriparatide is approved for osteoporosis. Post-marketing surveillance is critical given its widespread use.ObjectiveTo investigate adverse events (AEs) associated with teriparatide using the FAERS database, compare association strengths for key AEs, and explore potential applications to provide clinical reference.MethodsFAERS data from 2004 to 2023 were analyzed. Reports where teriparatide was the primary suspect drug were included. Adverse events were mapped to System Organ Classes and Preferred Terms. Disproportionality analysis using ROR, PRR, BCPNN and EBGM algorithms was conducted to detect safety signals.ResultsOut of 107,123 reports with teriparatide as the primary suspect, key AEs identified included pain in extremity (PRR: 4.54), muscle spasms (PRR: 5.11), fractures (PRR range: 17.67–552.95), and increased calcium levels (PRR: 50.73). Teriparatide exhibited a stronger association with increased calcium levels (PRR: 50.73) compared to fractures (PRR range: 17.67–552.95). Notably, only 10.86% of AE reports were submitted by physicians and another 10% by other health professionals. Subset analyses showed a higher consistency of reported AEs from health professionals compared to the general dataset. Off-label uses were noted in conditions such as arthritis (0.57%) and cancer (0.12%). For osteoporosis, main AEs were pain (18.2%), fractures (12.4%), muscle spasms (7.7%), and nausea (6.5%), while glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis AEs included fractures (24.1%), pain (13.2%), decreased bone density (9.8%), and nausea (5.1%).ConclusionOur findings provide real-world safety data on teriparatide, revealing key AEs and their association strengths. The low proportion of reports by healthcare professionals suggests the need for cautious interpretation. Continuous vigilance and further research are imperative to guide teriparatide’s clinical use.

Keywords