Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (Mar 2022)

Wild Boar Survives in a Landscape That Prohibits Anthropogenic Persecution

  • Yanwen Fu,
  • Yanwen Fu,
  • Yanwen Fu,
  • Mengyu Tan,
  • Mengyu Tan,
  • Mengyu Tan,
  • Yinan Gong,
  • Yinan Gong,
  • Yinan Gong,
  • Guojing Zhao,
  • Guojing Zhao,
  • Guojing Zhao,
  • Jianping Ge,
  • Jianping Ge,
  • Jianping Ge,
  • Haitao Yang,
  • Haitao Yang,
  • Haitao Yang,
  • Limin Feng,
  • Limin Feng,
  • Limin Feng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.820915
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Geopolitical borderlands are politically sensitive areas and biodiversity hotspots, strictly controlled by the government and military. How to ensure political security, while protecting the biodiversity in borderlands is a problem for ecologists and governments. In this study, the nest site selection of the wild boar Sus scrofa was a case study in the Sino-Russia borderland to understand the survival strategy of wild life under anthropogenic pressure. We investigated (a) how the spatial distribution of anthropogenic pressure and wild boar nests in the borderland and (b) how anthropogenic pressure and the border influence on the wild boars’ nest site selection. The Getis-Ord Gi* analysis was used to analyze the distribution patterns of wild boar nest sites and anthropogenic pressures in the borderland, the Structural Equation Models was used to explore the influence of border, roads, settlements, agricultural land, grassland and anthropogenic pressure on wild boars’ nest site selection. The results indicated that wild boar nest sites are close to the border, roads and agricultural land and away from settlements and grassland. Regardless of the combination of anthropogenic pressure, wild boars make the most advantageous choice and prefer to be closer to the borderland. We speculated that military control played a vital role in borderlands for animal protection under anthropogenic pressure. Wild boars benefit from the prohibition of anthropogenic persecution due to military control. Compared with existing measures, we suggest a different protection/wildlife management strategy, what we need to do may be to prohibit anthropogenic persecution rather than perform other human interventions to protect animals. However, for a species with trouble potential, we need to base our conservation strategies on the recovery of top predators, and play the community control role of top predators to avoid the occurrence of trouble.

Keywords