Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (Sep 2020)
Testing a Physical Hypothesis for the Relationship Between Climate Sensitivity and Double‐ITCZ Bias in Climate Models
Abstract
Abstract Tian (2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064119) found that Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 3 and 5 (CMIP3 and CMIP5) climate models with too much precipitation in a region of the Southeast Pacific (due to a double‐Intertropical Convergence Zone [ITCZ] bias) tend to have lower climate sensitivities and suggested that this might form the basis of an “emergent constraint,” which could rule out lower values of climate sensitivity. However, no physical mechanism has been proposed to explain this relationship. Here we advance the hypothesis that deep convection encroaching into regions that should be dominated by shallow clouds hampers the formation of shallow clouds in the present climate and reduces the magnitude of positive low‐level cloud feedbacks, resulting in smaller values of climate sensitivity. We test this hypothesis first by performing sensitivity tests with the HadGEM2‐A aquaplanet model subject to a uniform +4 K sea surface temperature (SST) perturbation, in which we vary the degree to which deep convection associated with the single/double ITCZ extends toward subtropical low‐cloud regions. Experiments with more precipitation encroaching into the subtropics have weaker subtropical cloud radiative effects in the present‐day simulations and less positive subtropical cloud feedbacks, consistent with our hypothesis. We test this hypothesis further by looking for the predicted relationships across multimodel ensembles of SST forced Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) experiments subject to a uniform +4 K SST increase. Relationships of the expected sign are found in the CMIP5 AMIP+4K experiments, but not all are statistically significant at the 5% level. We find no statistically significant support for our hypothesis in the currently available CMIP6 AMIP+4K experiments.
Keywords
