PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

High dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source model Monte Carlo dosimetry: mHDR-v2 and mHDR-v2r.

  • Shuhei Tsuji,
  • Naomasa Narihiro,
  • Masataka Oita,
  • Yoshihito Namito,
  • Hideo Hirayama

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298550
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 2
p. e0298550

Abstract

Read online

After 2010, the source model of the microSelectron HDR Afterloader System was slightly modified from the previous model. Granero et al. named the modified source model "mHDR-v2r (revised model mHDR-v2)" and the previous model "mHDR-v2". They concluded that the dosimetric differences arising from the dimensional changes between the mHDR-v2 and mHDR-v2r designs were negligible at almost all locations (within 0.5% for r ≥ 0.25 cm), the two-dimensional anisotropy function difference between the two sources is found 2.1% at r = 1.0 cm when compared with the results of the other experimental group. To confirm this difference, we performed a full Monte Carlo simulation without energy-fluence approximation. This is useful near the radiation source where charged-particle equilibrium does not hold. The two-dimensional anisotropy function of the TG-43U1 dataset showed a few percent difference between the mHDR-v2r and mHDR-v2 sources. There was no agreement in the immediate vicinity of the source (0.10 cm and 0.25 cm), when compared to Granero et al. in mHDR-v2r sources. The differences in these two-dimensional anisotropy functions were identified.