EBioMedicine (Dec 2023)

ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humansResearch in context

  • Manuel Spitschan,
  • Laura Kervezee,
  • Renske Lok,
  • Elise McGlashan,
  • Raymond P. Najjar,
  • Annette E. Allen,
  • Marilyne Andersen,
  • Salvador Bará,
  • Peter Blattner,
  • Christine Blume,
  • Diane B. Boivin,
  • María-Ángeles Bonmatí-Carrión,
  • Kai Broszio,
  • Timothy M. Brown,
  • Sarah Laxhmi Chellappa,
  • Jeanne F. Duffy,
  • Taisuke Eto,
  • Erin Flynn-Evans,
  • Steve Fotios,
  • Virginie Gabel,
  • Corrado Garbazza,
  • Gena Glickman,
  • Marijke C. Gordijn,
  • John P. Hanifin,
  • Lauren Hartstein,
  • Michael Herf,
  • Shigekazu Higuchi,
  • Cassie J. Hilditch,
  • Kevin W. Houser,
  • Anya Hurlbert,
  • Monique K. LeBourgeois,
  • Steven Lockley,
  • Robert Lucas,
  • Claudia R.C. Moreno,
  • Mirjam Münch,
  • Ludovic S. Mure,
  • Stuart Peirson,
  • Shadab Rahman,
  • Victoria L. Revell,
  • Roberto G. Rodriguez,
  • Kathryn Roecklein,
  • A.V. Rukmini,
  • John Sammarco,
  • Nayantara Santhi,
  • Luc J.M. Schlangen,
  • Isabel Schöllhorn,
  • Katherine M. Sharkey,
  • Debra J. Skene,
  • Tracey L. Sletten,
  • Karin C.H.J. Smolders,
  • Oliver Stefani,
  • Julia E. Stone,
  • Petteri Teikari,
  • Michael Terman,
  • Khanh Tran Quoc,
  • Kazuo Tsubota,
  • Ljiljana Udovicic,
  • Gilles Vandewalle,
  • Jennifer A. Veitch,
  • CélineVetter,
  • Lisa M. Wu,
  • Johannes Zauner,
  • Jamie Zeitzer

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 98
p. 104889

Abstract

Read online

Summary: Background: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology. Methods: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts. Findings: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&E document. Interpretation: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies. Funding: Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020–09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002).

Keywords