Frontiers in Physiology (Jul 2023)

Reconstruction of the human lower esophageal sphincter based on ultra-mill imaging for biomechanical analysis

  • Jack Xu,
  • Savindi Wijenayaka,
  • Recep Avci,
  • Leo K. Cheng,
  • Peng Du

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1128903
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) controls the passage into the stomach and prevents reflex of contents into the esophagus. Dysfunctions of this region typically involves impairment of muscular function, leading to diseases including gastro-esophageal reflux disease and achalasia. The main objective of this study was to develop a finite element model from a unique human LES dataset reconstructed from an ultra-mill imaging setup, and then to investigate the effect of anatomical characteristics on intraluminal pressures.Methods: A pipeline was developed to generate a mesh from a set of input images, which were extracted from a unique ultra-mill sectioned human LES. A total of 216 nodal points with cubic Hermite basis function was allocated to reconstruct the LES, including the longitudinal and circumferential muscles. The resultant LES mesh was used in biomechanical simulations, utilizing a previously developed LES mathematical model based on the Visible Human data to calculate intraluminal pressures. Anatomical and functional comparisons were made between the Ultra-mill and Visible human models.Results: Overall, the Ultra-mill model contained lower cavity (1,796 vs. 5,400 mm3) and muscle (1,548 vs. 15,700 mm3) volumes than the Visible Human model. The Ultra-mill model also developed a higher basal pressure (13.8 vs. 14.7 mmHg) and magnitude of pressure (19.8 vs. 18.9 mmHg) during contraction. Out of all the geometric transformations (i.e., uniform enlargement of volume, lengthening along the center-axis, dilation of the diameter, and increasing muscle thickness), the muscle volume was found to be the main contributor of basal and magnitude of pressures. Increases in length also caused proportional increases to pressures, while dilation of diameter had a less influential reverse effect.Discussion: The findings provide information on interindividual variability in LES pressure and demonstrates that anatomy has a large influence on pressures. This model forms the basis of more complex simulations involving food bolus transport and predicting LES dysfunctions.

Keywords