Frontiers in Psychology (Oct 2019)

Trans-Cultural Validation of the “Academic Flow Scale” (Flow 4D 16) in Arabic Language: Insights for Occupational and Educational Psychology From an Exploratory Study

  • Nasr Chalghaf,
  • Nasr Chalghaf,
  • Nasr Chalghaf,
  • Chiraz Azaiez,
  • Chiraz Azaiez,
  • Hela Krakdiya,
  • Hela Krakdiya,
  • Noomen Guelmami,
  • Noomen Guelmami,
  • Noomen Guelmami,
  • Tania Simona Re,
  • Tania Simona Re,
  • Tania Simona Re,
  • Juan José Maldonado Briegas,
  • Riccardo Zerbetto,
  • Giovanni Del Puente,
  • Sergio Garbarino,
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,
  • Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,
  • Fairouz Azaiez,
  • Fairouz Azaiez,
  • Fairouz Azaiez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02330
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background: As an optimal psychological state, flow represents those moments when everything comes together for the performer. Flow is often associated with high levels of performance and is a positive psychological experience.Aim: Our study aimed to validate the “Academic Flow Scale” (Flow 4D 16) in Arabic language across Tunisian population, and to test its factor structure, in terms of internal consistency/reliability, predictive validity, and sensitivity.Methods: The population is composed of 320 students (139 men and 181 women) belonging to the University of Sfax, with a mean age of 22.26 years. The students voluntarily responded to the scale of academic flow (Flow 4D 16). Both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses were performed.Results: The four-dimensional alpha coefficients of the Flow 4D 16 indicate an excellent internal consistency, respectively, of 0.902 (Cognitive), 0.959 (Time), 0.974 (Ego) and 0.960 (Well-being). The CFA fit indices were satisfactory.Conclusion: In summary, the 16-items model (original version) showed for all the indices an excellent fit to the theoretical model, confirming the four-dimensional factor structure among Tunisian student population.

Keywords