Journal of Medical Internet Research (Jun 2023)

Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study

  • Jake Kraska,
  • Karen Bell,
  • Shane Costello

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/45334
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25
p. e45334

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) is a mental health screening tool with conflicting studies regarding its factor structure. No studies have yet attempted to develop a computer adaptive test (CAT) version of it. ObjectiveThis study calibrated items for, and simulated, a DASS-21 CAT using a nonclinical sample. MethodsAn evaluation sample (n=580) was used to evaluate the DASS-21 scales via confirmatory factor analysis, Mokken analysis, and graded response modeling. A CAT was simulated with a validation sample (n=248) and a simulated sample (n=10,000) to confirm the generalizability of the model developed. ResultsA bifactor model, also known as the “quadripartite” model (1 general factor with 3 specific factors) in the context of the DASS-21, displayed good fit. All scales displayed acceptable fit with the graded response model. Simulation of 3 unidimensional (depression, anxiety, and stress) CATs resulted in an average 17% to 48% reduction in items administered when a reliability of 0.80 was acceptable. ConclusionsThis study clarifies previous conflicting findings regarding the DASS-21 factor structure and suggests that the quadripartite model for the DASS-21 items fits best. Item response theory modeling suggests that the items measure their respective constructs best between 0θ and 3θ (mild to moderate severity).