Technical aspects of rod-insertion forceps (persuader) application in reducing construct failure after lumbar spine fusion surgery: a biomechanical cadaveric study in Germany

Abstract

Study Design A prospective experimental study. Purpose This biomechanical in vitro study aimed to examine the extent to which the use of a rod persuader (RP) leads to additional mechanical stress on the screw–rod system and determine its influence on the bony anchoring of primary pedicle screws. Overview of Literature Degenerative spine diseases and deformities are the most common indications for the stabilization and fusion of spinal segments. The pedicle screw–rod system is considered the gold standard for dorsal stabilization, and an RP is also increasingly being considered to fit the spondylodesis material. Methods Ten lumbar spines from body donors were examined. Bisegmental dorsal spinal lumbar interbody fusion of the L3–L5 segments was performed using a pedicle screw–rod system (ROCCIA Multi-LIF Cage; Silony Medical, Germany). In group 1, the titanium rod was inserted without tension, whereas in group 2, the rod was attached to the pedicle screws at the L4 and L5 levels, creating a 5-mm gap. To attach the rod, the RP was used to press the rod into the pedicle screw. The rod was left in place for 30 minutes and then removed. Results The rod reduction technique significantly increased the mechanical load on the overall construct measured by strain gauges (p<0.05) and resulted in outright implant failure with pedicle screw pullout in 88.9%. Conclusions In cases where the spondylodesis material is not fully attached within the pedicle screw, an RP can be used with extreme caution, particularly in osteoporotic bones, to avoid pedicle screw avulsion and screw anchor failure.

Keywords

• rod persuader
• spine surgery
• pedicle screw avulsion
• lumbar spine
• biomechanics