Fisioterapia e Pesquisa (Dec 2018)

Incremental shuttle walk test performed in a hallway and on a treadmill: are they interchangeable?

  • Cristiane Santos de Oliveira,
  • Anderson José,
  • Crislaine Oliveira Santos,
  • Cristiane Helga Yamane de Oliveira,
  • Thiago Cristiano Oliveira Carvalho,
  • Jaksoel Cunha Silva,
  • Jessyca Pachi Rodrigues Selman,
  • Rejane Agnelo Silva de Castro,
  • Anderson Alves de Camargo,
  • Simone Dal Corso

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17008125042018
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 4
pp. 395 – 403

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT The performances of healthy individuals in an incremental shuttle walking test performed in a hallway (ISWT-H) and on a treadmill (ISWT-T) were compared to assess their physiological responses during aerobic training sessions with the speeds estimated from both tests. This was a cross-sectional study with 55 healthy subjects, who were randomized to perform the ISWT tests with 24 hours between them. Training sessions were held using a treadmill at 75% of the speeds obtained from the ISWT-H and ISWT-T. Measurements included walking distance, oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide (VCO2) production, heart rate (HR), and ventilation (VE). There was a significant difference between walking distances (ISWT-T: 823.9±165.2 m and ISWT-H:685.4±141.4 m), but similar physiological responses for VO2 (28.6±6.6 vs. 29.0±7.3 ml-1.kg-1.min-1), VCO2 (1.9±0.7 vs. 1.9±0.5 1), HR (158.3±17.8 vs. 158.6±17.7 bpm), and VE (41.5±10.4 vs. 43.7±12.9 1). The estimated speeds were different for the training sessions (5.5±0.5 km/h and 4.9±0.3 km/h), as well as the VO2, VCO2, VE, and HR. It was concluded that in healthy young adults, ISWTs carried out in a hallway and on a treadmill are not interchangeable. Since the ISWT-H was determined to have lower speed, the training intensity based on this test may underestimate a patient’s responses to aerobic training.

Keywords