IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics (Jan 2023)

iGSE-C<sub>D</sub>&#x2014;An Electric-/Displacement-Field Related Steinmetz Model for Class II Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors Under Low-Frequency Large-Signal Excitation

  • David Menzi,
  • Morris Heller,
  • George Kerridge,
  • Peter Marley,
  • Angela Ellmore,
  • Shmuel Ben-Yaakov,
  • Johann W. Kolar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/OJPEL.2023.3240838
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4
pp. 107 – 116

Abstract

Read online

Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors (MLCCs) are of paramount importance in electronics and ferroelectric Class II dielectrics enable outstanding energy-density values. However, the non-linear dielectric constant and associated low-frequency large-signal excitation losses of Class II MLCCs may cause critical overheating. A peak-charge based Steinmetz loss model entitled iGSE-CQ is known in literature and allows to accurately calculate MLCC low-frequency large-signal excitation losses under various operating conditions including biased and non-sinusoidal excitation voltage waveforms. Such a macroscopic iGSE-CQ model, however, is inherently limited to a specific MLCC, and in contrast to Steinmetz loss modeling for ferromagnetic inductor cores, the losses of other devices employing the same dielectric material cannot be predicted. Recent literature therefore proposed a microscopic and/or material specific MLCC Steinmetz Model entitled iGSE-CD which allows to calculate the losses of any MLCC of the same dielectric material based upon just a single set of Steinmetz parameters. However, due to the lack of information on the internal device geometry, the iGSE-CD could be verified only indirectly so far by means of a loss normalization based on the device capacitance and rated voltage. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of a microscopic iGSE-CD MLCC loss model enabled by manufacturer data on the internal capacitor structure. The iGSE-CD is verified for two different MLCC series employing a conventional X7R dielectric and a novel Hiteca (with reduced non-linearity) Class II dielectric material with loss estimation error below $22\%$. This error results due to component tolerances and is acceptable, especially when compared to the loss calculation based on the datasheet information which can be off by up to a factor of ten. The analysis of the Hiteca dielectric reveals a frequency behavior different to the X7R material, and is discussed in the Appendix of this paper.

Keywords