Knee Surgery & Related Research (Jun 2024)

Residual deficits of knee and hip joint coordination and clinical performance after return to sports in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Komsak Sinsurin,
  • Pongthanayos Kiratisin,
  • Dimas Sondang Irawan,
  • Roongtiwa Vachalathiti,
  • Jim Richards

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00213-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 36, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Biomechanical changes and neuromuscular adaptations have been suggested as risk factors of secondary injury in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). To achieve a better understanding of preventive mechanisms, movement quality is an important factor of consideration. Few studies have explored time-series analysis during landing alongside clinical performance in injured and non-injured individuals. The purpose of the study was to investigate the biomechanical risks of recurrent injury by comparing clinical and jump-landing performance assessments between athletes with ACLr and healthy controls. Method This study was observational study. Sixteen athletes with and without ACLr voluntarily participated in clinical and laboratory measurements. Single-leg hop distance, isokinetic tests, landing error score, and limb symmetry index (LSI) were included in clinical report. Lower limb movements were recorded to measure joint biomechanics during multi-directional landings in motion analysis laboratory. Hip-knee angle and angular velocity were explored using discrete time-point analysis, and a two-way mixed analysis of variance (2 × 4, group × jump-landing direction) was used for statistical analysis. Time series and hip-knee coordination analyses were performed using statistical parametric mapping and descriptive techniques. Results Significantly lower single-leg hop distance was noted in ACLr group (158.10 cm) compared to control group (178.38 cm). Although the hip and knee moments showed significant differences between four directions (p 0.05). Statistical parametric mapping showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between groups for hip abduction and coordinate plot of hip and knee joints. Athletes with ACLr demonstrated a higher velocity of hip adduction. Time-series analysis revealed differences in coordination between groups for frontal hip and knee motion. Conclusions Athletes with ACLr landed with poor hip adduction control and stiffer knee on the involved side. Multi-directions landing should be considered over the entire time series, which may facilitate improved movement quality and return to sports in athletes with ACLr.

Keywords