Assessment of student understanding on light interference

Abstract

Light interference is an essential topic for understanding the wavelike nature of light, however, there are limited studies on modeling and assessing students’ misconceptions and learning difficulties in this area. Based on the knowledge integration modeling approach, a conceptual framework for light interference is developed and used to model student understanding and guide the development of an assessment tool on light interference. The conceptual framework provides a representation of students’ reasoning pathways to clearly show their connections through different conceptual components and contextual features of problem-solving settings. This type of representation focuses on showing students’ knowledge structures regarding the features of integration and fragmentation. Experts’ reasoning pathways always flow through a central idea of a concept with well-established connections to a wide range of contextual features and conditions. These connections form an integrated knowledge structure, which demonstrates deep understanding. In contrast, novices often focus on surface details without linking the central idea, forming fragmented local connections that link directly between contextual features and task outcomes. As a result, novice students’ problem solving often relies on memorization of formula and solutions without any deep understanding. Through testing and interviews at a large Chinese university, a light interference test (LIT) has been developed and validated. Assessment results also demonstrate that students with a strong conceptual understanding of the central idea are able to apply expertlike reasoning to familiar and novel questions regardless of the contextual details. Meanwhile, students with weaker or nonexistent understanding of the central idea often struggle when novel situations are presented. LIT provides a useful tool to measure students’ conceptual understanding on light interference and probe thought pathways of students’ reasoning that can further indicate students’ knowledge structure and levels of deep understanding.