The European Zoological Journal (Jan 2017)
Feeding strategy and ontogenetic changes in diet of gurnards (Teleostea: Scorpaeniformes: Triglidae) from the Adriatic Sea
Abstract
A multi-specific approach in fish diet studies provides insight into the complexity of trophic interactions in marine communities. The feeding habits of three gurnard species, Aspitrigla cuculus, Chelidonichthys lucerna and Eutrigla gurnardus (Scorpaeniformes: Triglidae), from the north-middle Adriatic Sea were studied to evaluate prey-resource partitioning amongst species and within species, comparing juveniles’ and adults’ diet for each gurnard species. A total of 1818 specimens (390 A. cuculus, 973 C. lucerna, 455 E. gurnardus) were collected by bottom trawling and they were assigned to size classes (juveniles or adults) on the basis of macroscopic evaluation of the gonads. Stomach contents were analysed. A common dietary preference for Crustacea was found in all species and size classes considered. Nevertheless, gurnards showed distinct feeding behaviour: C. lucerna and E. gurnardus were generalist-opportunistic predators, showing a varied diet based on epi-benthic, bentho-pelagic and necto-benthic preys belonging to different taxa such as Teleostei and Mollusca, while A. cuculus may be considered a specialist feeder, feeding almost exclusively on necto-benthic invertebrates. Morisita’s index calculated for critical size classes (juveniles and adults) pointed out differences. At the inter-specific level, possible dietary competition between A. cuculus and E. gurnardus (C > 0.65) was found for all size classes combined, due to the prey abundance of Lophogaster typicus (Crustacea: Mysida). At the intra-specific level, high diet overlap was found between juveniles and adults of C. cuculus (C = 0.98) and between juveniles and adults of E. gurnardus (C > 0.84). In contrast, C. lucerna did not compete with increasing body size (C < 0.20), showing a clear change from crustaceans to fish in its diet preferences. The possibility that A. cuculus and E. gurnardus may compete for the same prey resources while C. lucerna shows food resource partitioning is discussed. Better understanding of the ecology of these coexisting predators should lead to improved conservation and improved fisheries management.
Keywords