European Psychiatry (Apr 2024)

Intranasal esketamine efficacy as a treatment for treatment-resistant depression, case series

  • C. Delgado Marmisa,
  • I. Álvarez Correa,
  • H. Vizcaíno Herrezuelo,
  • L. Egüen Recuero,
  • E. Garrido Dobrito,
  • L. Gayubo Moreo,
  • B. Sanz-Aranguez,
  • L. Delgado Tellez,
  • L. Caballero Martínez,
  • R. De Arce Cordón,
  • B. Jiménez-Fernández

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1440
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 67
pp. S692 – S692

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Intranasal esketamine has been approved as a treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression. We analyzed the results of its efficacy in 15 patients. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of intranasal Esketamine as a treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression Methods Case series Results For the last 8 months, since the treatment with intranasal esketamine was approved for resistant depression, we have treated 14 patients with this drug. Through this process, we followed a standardized method consisting in the following steps: On the first esketamine session (DAY 1) the patient has to fill a CGI and a MADRS scale. On the second esketamine session (DAY 7) the patient has to fill a CGI, a MADRS scale, a form about the level of satisfaction with the drug and a last form in which they can include the secondary effects. On week 6 since the start of the treatment, the patient has to fill again a CGI, a MADRS scale, a form about the level of satisfaction with the drug and a last form in which they can include the secondary effects. In the 6th month since the start of the treatment, the patient has to fill again a CGI, a MADRS scale, a form about the level of satisfaction with the drug and a last form in which they can include the secondary effects they have perceived. We analyzed and compared all of the previous data and obtained the following results: At day 7: 64% of the patients had a response in the form of improvement, of which 66% were feeling “slightly better” and 33% were feeling “better”. At week 6: 71% of the patients had a response in the form of improvement, of which 50% were feeling “slightly better” and the other 50% were feeling “better”. At month 6: only 28% of the patients completed the treatment; of which 100% had a response in the form of improvement: 50% were feeling “slightly better”, 25% were feeling “better” and 25% were feeling “far better”. Conclusions Although our data suggests that intranasal esketamine has been effective in short term depressive symptoms, we have yet no information about its medium and long-term efficacy or secondary effects. Nevertheless, other potential factors should be evaluated as they could affect the results in the long-term such as the difficulty in maintaining the treatment for more than 6 weeks. In addition, the patients who experienced the most improvement according to our data were patients with a TAB diagnosis, so this could be an interesting research focus. Disclosure of Interest None Declared