American Journal of Islam and Society (Mar 1990)
Editorial
Abstract
Our first contributor is Anwar Ibrahim, the Malaysian Minister of Education. He has described in very convincing style the need to differentiate between science and non-science. The values, politics, ideology, power, prestige and polemics of science play an important role in it. In shaping a contemporary philosophy of science, Anwar Ibrahim emphasizes the need to infuse the entire system of science, its method, its processes, and its goals with the ethical and value concerns of the world-view of Islam. Our study of the history of science in Islam should help us to understand what was original and Islamic about Islamic science and how the Muslim scientists infused their wrk with Islamic ethics and values and interpreted their task through Muslim eyes. The purpose of developing a contemporary philosophy of Islamic science, according to Anwar Ibrahim, is to help our scientists to construct a global foundation for contemporary Islamic knowledge and science. This would allow the development of a pragmatic philosophy which takes the ethical concerns of Islam into the laboratory. This kind of theory should help prioritize certain research, and formulate science policies for Muslim societies. This theory should be able to demonstrate to both Muslims and non- Muslims alike that science not only helps in meeting the intellectual and physical challenges of modern times but can also solve contemporary problems of mankind in more satisfying and ethically sound ways. In his opening remarks at the Seminar on ‘‘Paradigms in Pblitical Science: Muslim Perspectives,” organized by the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) and The Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS) in Jumada al Awwal 1410/Dec. 1989, Dr. Taha Jabir Al ‘Alwani, President of IIIT, traced political science in classical Islamic heritage. Al ‘Alwani that we do not have specializep studies in our classical legacy that may be described today as political thought. Issues related to subjects like international relations, systems of government, history of diplomacy, political development, or methods of political planning, however, were treated through the medium of fiqh. There were no well-defined divisions between all other aspects of life and the political issues as there are’in contemporary social sciences. Al ‘Alwani argues that the fiqh of contemporary politics and government must turn to the goals and purposes of Islam, to its general principles and to its precepts. This will build a complete system of political thought that will interact with contemporary realities for the realization of Islam’s greater purposes. Al ‘Alwani, however, warns that theories will have to be erected upon the basis of accepted Shari‘ah source-evidence, while drawing from the experience of historical and contemporary humanity ...