Digital Diagnostics (Apr 2023)

Volumetry versus linear diameter lung nodule measurement: an ultra-low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening study

  • Maria M. Suchilova,
  • Ivan A. Blokhin,
  • Olga O. Aleshina,
  • Victor A. Gombolevskiy,
  • Roman V. Reshetnikov,
  • Viktor Yu. Bosin,
  • Olga V. Omelyanskaya,
  • Anton V. Vladzymyrskyy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/DD117481
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 5 – 13

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND: The DutchBelgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NELSON) used a volume-based protocol and significantly reduced the prevalence of false-positive results (2.1%). AIM: To compare the performance of manual linear diameter and semi-automated volumetric nodule measurement in the pilot project Moscow Lung Cancer Screening ultra-low-dose computed tomography pilot study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included individuals with a lung nodule of at least 4 mm on baseline-computed tomography of the Moscow lung cancer screening between February 2017 and February 2018, without verified lung cancer diagnosis until 2020. The radiation dose was selected individually and did not exceed 1 mSv. All scans were assessed by three blinded readers to measure the maximum and minimum transversal nodule diameter and extrapolated volume. As a reference value of size and volume, the average value from the results of expert measurements was obtained. A false-positive nodule was defined as a nodule 6 mm/100 mm3 and a false-negative nodule as a nodule 6 mm/100 mm3. RESULTS: Overall, 293 patients were included (166 men; mean age, 64.6 5.3years); 199 lung nodules were 6 mm/100 mm3 and 94 were 6 mm/100 mm3. Regarding volumetric measurements, 32 [10.9%; 4 false-positive, 28 false-negative], 29 [9.9%; 17 false-positive, 12 false-negative], and 30 [10.2%; 6 false-positive, 24 false-negative] nodule discrepancies were reported by readers 1, 2, and 3 respectively. For linear diameter measurement, 92 [65.5%; 107 false-positive, 85 false-negative], 146 [49.8%; 58 false-positive, 88 false-negative], and 102 [34.8%; 23 false-positive, 79 false-negative] nodule discrepancies were reported by readers 1, 2, and 3 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lung nodule volumetry strongly reduces the number of false-positive and false-negative nodules compared with nodule diameter measurements, in an ultra-low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening program.

Keywords