Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment (Sep 2022)
Drugs price and reimbursement regulation: comparators, endpoints and role of the cost-effectiveness
- Claudio Jommi,
- Giovanni Apolone,
- Giovanna Scroccaro,
- Valentina Acciai,
- Antonio Addis,
- Andrea Ardizzoni,
- Renato Bernardini,
- Alberto Bortolami,
- Alessia Brigido,
- Giuliano Buzzetti,
- Pier Luigi Canonico,
- Francesca Caprari,
- Stefano Centanni,
- Chiara Cernetti,
- Americo Cicchetti,
- Giorgio Corsico,
- Francesco Damele,
- Filippo De Braud,
- Sara Manurita,
- Francesco Saverio Mennini,
- Irene Olivi,
- Federica Parretta,
- Lara Pippo,
- Stefania Pulimeno,
- Massimo Riccaboni,
- Giuseppe Rossi,
- Cecilia Saleri,
- Alessandra Sinibaldi,
- Federico Spandonaro,
- Cristian Stefenoni,
- Elena Visentin,
- Pierluigi Viale,
- Giuseppina Zapparelli,
- Patrizia Popoli
Affiliations
- Claudio Jommi
- SDA Bocconi, Milano - Italy
- Giovanni Apolone
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano - Italy
- Giovanna Scroccaro
- Regione Veneto, Venezia - Italy
- Valentina Acciai
- Ipsen, Milano - Italy
- Antonio Addis
- Dipartimento Epidemiologia del Servizio Sanitario Regionale - Regione Lazio, Roma - Italy
- Andrea Ardizzoni
- Università degli Studi di Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna IRCCS - Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna - Italy
- Renato Bernardini
- Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania - Italy
- Alberto Bortolami
- Rete Oncologica del Veneto, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova - Italy
- Alessia Brigido
- Ipsen, Milano - Italy
- Giuliano Buzzetti
- Dephaforum, Milano - Italy
- Pier Luigi Canonico
- Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara - Italy
- Francesca Caprari
- Alexion Pharma, Milano - Italy
- Stefano Centanni
- Università degli Studi di Milano, ASST – Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milano - Italy
- Chiara Cernetti
- Beigene, Milano - Italy
- Americo Cicchetti
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma - Italy
- Giorgio Corsico
- Amgen, Milano - Italy
- Francesco Damele
- Sanofi, Milano - Italy
- Filippo De Braud
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano - Italy
- Sara Manurita
- BMS, Roma - Italy
- Francesco Saverio Mennini
- Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma - Italy
- Irene Olivi
- CSL Behring, Milano - Italy
- Federica Parretta
- Abbvie, Roma - Italy
- Lara Pippo
- CSL Behring, Milano - Italy
- Stefania Pulimeno
- Teva, Milano - Italy
- Massimo Riccaboni
- IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca - Italy
- Giuseppe Rossi
- ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia - Italy
- Cecilia Saleri
- AstraZeneca, Milano - Italy
- Alessandra Sinibaldi
- Galápagos Biopharma Italy, Milano - Italy
- Federico Spandonaro
- Università Telematica San Raffaele, Roma - Italy
- Cristian Stefenoni
- Pfizer, Roma - Italy
- Elena Visentin
- Galápagos Biopharma Italy, Milano - Italy
- Pierluigi Viale
- Università degli Studi di Bologna, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna IRCCS - Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna - Italy
- Giuseppina Zapparelli
- BMS, Roma - Italy
- Patrizia Popoli
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma - Italy
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2022.2475
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 9,
no. 1
Abstract
This document illustrates the results of a discussion of two multi-disciplinary expert panels on pricing and reimbursement of medicines. Experts work in different organizations. The discussion focused on comparator(s), endpoint(s), negotiation of prices of new medicines and/or indications to include in the List 648, as well as the role of cost-effectiveness in the price and reimbursement negotiation. The debate took place during the fourth edition of the Seminari di Mogliano, organized on the 30th of September/1st of October, 2021. The two panels agreed on a general need to enhance interaction among the different stakeholders, in the early assessment and negotiation phases, and to increase the transparency/reproducibility of the decisions taken. The experts have also emphasized the need (i) to improve clarity in the evaluation of additional therapeutic value and the place in therapy with respect to comparators and how comparators are identified; (ii) to create work groups to identify the most appropriate endpoint(s), for each therapeutic area and level of unmet needs; (iii) to provide for a systematic use of cost-effectiveness when an added therapeutic value is delivered by a new medicine. With regard to the 648 List, the experts advocated for an overall reorganization of the current rules governing the special uses of drugs.
Keywords