BMC Medical Education (May 2019)

Outcomes of three different ways to train medical students as ultrasound tutors

  • Nora Celebi,
  • Jan Griewatz,
  • Nisar Peter Malek,
  • Tatjana Hoffmann,
  • Carina Walter,
  • Reinhold Muller,
  • Reimer Riessen,
  • Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich,
  • Ines Debove,
  • Stephan Zipfel,
  • Eckhart Fröhlich

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1556-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In order to provide faculty-wide undergraduate ultrasound training in times of scarce resources, many medical faculties employ trained peer-student tutors to oversee the hands-on training. However, data to guide the training of ultrasound peer-student tutors are scarce. We conducted a prospective quasi-randomized study to assess the gain in theoretical knowledge and practical scanning skills of peer-student tutors who were trained with a course only, an internship only, or the combination of a course and an internship. Methods A total of 44 peer-student tutors were trained by a one-week course only (C-Group, n = 21), by an internship only (I-Group, n = 10) or by a course and an internship (CI-Group, n = 13). Prior to and after the completion of the training the peer-student tutors completed an MC-test (theoretical knowledge) and an OSCE (practical scanning skills). Results With all three education concepts, the peer-student tutors had significant and comparable gains in theoretical knowledge (C-group + 90%, I-group + 61.5%, CI-group + 114.0%) and practical scanning skills (C-group + 112.0%, I-group + 155.0% and CI-group + 123.5%), all p < 0.001. Conclusion Peer-student tutors, who were trained with a course or an internship or a course and internship improved their theoretical knowledge and their practical scanning skills significantly and to a comparable degree.

Keywords