Diagnostics (Apr 2022)

Betablockers and Ivabradine Titration According to Exercise Test in LV Only Fusion CRT Pacing

  • Cristina Vacarescu,
  • Constantin-Tudor Luca,
  • Horea Feier,
  • Dan Gaiță,
  • Simina Crișan,
  • Alina-Gabriela Negru,
  • Stela Iurciuc,
  • Emilia-Violeta Goanță,
  • Cristian Mornos,
  • Mihai-Andrei Lazăr,
  • Caius-Glad Streian,
  • Diana-Aurora Arnăutu,
  • Vladiana-Romina Turi,
  • Dragos Cozma

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051096
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
p. 1096

Abstract

Read online

Background: Betablockers (BB)/ivabradine titration in fusion CRT pacing (CRTP) is understudied. Aim: To assess drug optimization using systematic exercise tests (ET) in fusion CRTP with preserved atrioventricular conduction (AVc). Methods: Changes in drug management were assessed during systematic follow-ups in CRTP patients without right ventricle lead. Shorter AVc (PR interval) allowed BB up-titration, while longer AVc needed BB down-titration, favoring ivabradine. Constant fusion pacing was the goal to improve outcomes. Results: 64 patients, 62.5 ± 9.5 y.o divided into three groups: shorter PR (<160 ms), normal (160–200 ms), longer (200–240 ms); follow-up 59 ± 26 months. Drugs were titrated in case of: capture loss due to AVc shortening (14%), AVc lengthening (5%), chronotropic incompetence (11%), maximum tracking rate issues (9%), brady/tachyarrhythmias (8%). Interventions: BB up-titration (78% shorter PR, 19% normal PR, 5% longer PR), BB down-titration (22% shorter PR, 14% normal PR), BB exclusion (16% longer PR), adding/up-titration ivabradine (22% shorter PR, 19% normal PR, 5% longer PR), ivabradine down-titration (22% shorter PR, 3% normal PR), ivabradine exclusion (11% normal PR, 5% longer PR). Drug strategy was changed in 165 follow-ups from 371 recorded (42% patients). Conclusions: BBs/ivabradine titration and routine ET during follow-ups in patients with fusion CRTP should be a standard approach to maximize resynchronization response. Fusion CRTP showed a positive outcome with important LV reverse remodeling and significant LVEF improvement in carefully selected patients.

Keywords