Japanese Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial of Neurosurgical Clipping versus Endovascular Coiling in 1863 Patients with Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract

This is a post hoc multivariate analysis of the modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grading project, multicenter prospective observational study including 38 neurosurgical institutions across Japan. Japan Neurosurgical Society WFNS grading committee conducted a modified WFNS grading project as a nationwide prospective registry study. We investigate the clinical outcome of both surgical and endovascular interventions after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in Japan. A total of 792 patients received surgical intervention and 417 patients received endovascular treatment. Eight hundred patients were female, and 409 patients were male. The mean age was 61.5 ± 13.7 years. At 3 month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in good clinical outcome between surgical (68.2%) and endovascular (60.9%) group (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.16; p = 0.381). Unfavorable outcome rate was 31.8% (238 patients) in the surgical group and 39.1% (154 patients) in the endovascular group. Male, elderly people, modified Rankin scale condition before onset, high-grade modified WFNS clinical grading scale, intracerebral hematoma, posttreatment normal pressure hydrocephalus, and neurological deficit due to symptomatic vasospasm were risk factors for the clinical outcome. Treatment modality was not a statistical factor for clinical outcomes. Surgical clipping has still a major role in the management of SAH in Japan. The present study was not a randomized controlled study, but clinical outcome is not influenced by treatment modalities.

Keywords

• clip occlusion
• coil embolization
• intracranial aneurysm
• outcomes
• subarachnoid hemorrhage