Frontiers in Nutrition (Oct 2023)

A scoping review and critical evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in the preconception

  • Mónica Ancira-Moreno,
  • Mónica Ancira-Moreno,
  • Soraya Burrola-Méndez,
  • Soraya Burrola-Méndez,
  • Cinthya Muñoz-Manrique,
  • Cinthya Muñoz-Manrique,
  • Isabel Omaña-Guzmán,
  • Isabel Omaña-Guzmán,
  • Elizabeth Hoyos-Loya,
  • Alejandra Trejo-Domínguez,
  • Sonia Hernández-Cordero,
  • Sonia Hernández-Cordero,
  • Mónica Mazariegos,
  • Mónica Mazariegos,
  • Natalia Smith,
  • Loredana Tavano-Colaizzi,
  • Jennifer Mier-Cabrera,
  • Fermín Avendaño-Álvarez,
  • Salvador Espino y Sosa,
  • Salvador Espino y Sosa,
  • Karla Muciño-Sandoval,
  • Lizeth Ibarra-González,
  • Lizeth Ibarra-González,
  • Cristina Medina-Avilés,
  • Cristina Medina-Avilés

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1122289
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendations for specific clinical circumstances, including maternal malnutrition. This study aimed to identify the CPGs that provide recommendations for preventing, diagnosing, and treating women’s malnutrition. Additionally, we sought to assess the methodological quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.MethodsAn online search for CPGs was performed, looking for those that contained lifestyle and nutritional recommendations to prevent, diagnose and treat malnutrition in women during the preconception period using PubMed and different websites. The reviewers utilized the AGREE II instrument to appraise the quality of the CPGs. We defined high-quality guidelines with a final score of > 70%.ResultsThe titles and abstracts from 30 guidelines were screened for inclusion, of which 20 guidelines were fully reviewed for quality assessment. The overall quality assessment of CPGs was 73%, and only 55% reached a high-quality classification. The domains in the guidelines classified as high-quality had the highest scores in “Scope and Purpose” and “Clarity of Presentation” with a median of 98.5 and 93%, respectively.DiscussionFurther assessment is needed to improve the quality of the guidelines, which is an opportunity to strengthen them, especially in the domains with the lowest scores.

Keywords