Clinical and Translational Allergy (Oct 2023)

Difficult‐to‐treat asthma patients from ethnic minority groups in central England are at an enhanced risk of house dust mite sensitisation

  • Adel H. Mansur,
  • Julie Marsh,
  • Ali Bahron,
  • Maximillian Thomas,
  • Gareth Walters,
  • John Busby,
  • Liam G. Heaney,
  • Mamidipudi Thirumala Krishna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12303
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 10
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background House dust mite (HDM) is the most common sensitising allergen in asthma. Ethnic minority groups (EMGs) in the UK are more likely to live in deprived conditionings with a greater exposure to HDM and other aero‐allergens. Aim To compare the ethnicity‐based patterns of sensitisation to aero‐allergens and the impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in patients with difficult‐to‐treat asthma (DTA). Methods Data of patients with DTA were extracted from the registry of the Birmingham Regional Severe Asthma Service (BRSAS), which have a catchment population of 7.3million from Central England. Patients from White and EMG backgrounds were compared in terms of the prevalence of atopy, total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), specific serum IgE (ssIgE) and asthma related clinical outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore ethnicity‐based risk factors for HDM sensitisation. Results A total of 1272 patients [White 1016 (79.9%), EMG 256 (20.1%) EMG] with a median age of 51 years (range 16–97) were included in the analysis. Patients from EMG were more likely (64%) to reside in the worst scale of index of multiple deprivation (IMD) than the White patients (25.5%), p < 0.0001. Positive HDM sensitisation was more prevalent in the EMG than in the White group [142/216 (66%) versus 375/842 (45%), p < 0.0001]. The median HDM ssIgE level was higher in the EMG than in the White group [3.0 KUA/L (IQR 0.06, 11.5) versus 0.1 (0.01, 3.0), p < 0.000001]. The odds ratio for positive sensitisation to HDM conveyed by the EMG status was 2.61 (95%CI, 1.8–3.8), p < 0.0001. Compared to the White group, the EMG had higher median total serum IgE [326 KU/L (115, 971) versus 114 (29.8, 434.8), p < 0.000001], higher blood eosinophil count (0.36 × 109(0.18, 0.62) versus 0.23 (0.1,0.47), p < 0.000001), were marginally more atopic (79.2% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.098) and were less likely to being on maintenance oral corticosteroids (22% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion In this DTA cohort, positive HDM sensitisation was greater amongst the EMG than the White patients. The EMG status was a significant risk factor for HDM sensitisation.

Keywords