Ecological Informatics (Sep 2024)

Improving pollen-bearing honey bee detection from videos captured at hive entrance by combining deep learning and handling imbalance techniques

  • Dinh-Tu Nguyen,
  • Thi-Nhung Le,
  • Thi-Huong Phung,
  • Duc-Manh Nguyen,
  • Hong-Quan Nguyen,
  • Hong-Thai Pham,
  • Thi-Thu-Hong Phan,
  • Hai Vu,
  • Thi-Lan Le

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 82
p. 102744

Abstract

Read online

The number of pollen-bearing honey bees serves as a vital indicator for assessing colony balance and health. Despite its significance, prevailing detection techniques still rely heavily on manual observation and annotation, leading to time-consuming processes that cannot sustain long-term, continuous monitoring efforts. To facilitate automatic beehive monitoring, this study introduces an efficient method for pollen-bearing bee detection. Initially, we furnish a comprehensive dataset, dubbed VnPollenBee, meticulously annotated for pollen-bearing honey bee detection and classification. The dataset comprises 60,826 annotated boxes that delineate both pollen-bearing and non-pollen-bearing bees in 2051 images captured at the entrances of beehives under various environmental conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first dedicated dataset for pollen-bearing bee detection. The VnPollenBee dataset is publicly accessible to the research community at https://comvis-hust.github.io/datasets/pollenbee.html. Subsequently, we propose the incorporation of diverse techniques into two baseline models, namely YOLOv5 and Faster RCNN, to effectively address the imbalance that arises during the detection of pollen-bearing bees due to their number being typically much lower than the total number of bees present at hive entrances. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms the baseline models on the VnPollenBee dataset, yielding Precision, Recall, and F1 score of 99%, 93%, and 95%, respectively. Specifically, the improvements obtained are 3% and 2% in Recall and F1 score when using YOLOv5, and 3%, 2%, and 2% in Precision, Recall, and F1 score when using Faster RCNN. These findings confirm the potential of our approach to facilitate bee foraging behavior analysis and automated bee monitoring.

Keywords