Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach

Abstract

Introduction: The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed. Results: The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30–83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46–89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group. Conclusion: Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.

Keywords

• hospital stay
• subcostal uniportal vats
• lateral uniportal vats