JBJS Open Access (Jun 2023)

Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates

  • Anthony A. Oyekan, MD,
  • Joon Y. Lee, MD,
  • Jacob C. Hodges, MS,
  • Stephen R. Chen, MD,
  • Alan E. Wilson, MD,
  • Mitchell S. Fourman, MD, MPhil,
  • Elizabeth O. Clayton, MS,
  • Confidence Njoku-Austin, BA,
  • Jared A. Crasto, MD,
  • Mary Kay Wisniewski, MA,
  • Andrew Bilderback, MS,
  • Scott R. Gunn, MD,
  • William I. Levin, MD,
  • Robert M. Arnold, MD,
  • Katie L. Hinrichsen, MSN,
  • Christopher Mensah, MBA,
  • MaCalus V. Hogan, MD, MBA,
  • Daniel E. Hall, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00107
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Background:. Patient values may be obscured when decisions are made under the circumstances of constrained time and limited counseling. The objective of this study was to determine if a multidisciplinary review aimed at ensuring goal-concordant treatment and perioperative risk assessment in high-risk orthopaedic trauma patients would increase the quality and frequency of goals-of-care documentation without increasing the rate of adverse events. Methods:. We prospectively analyzed a longitudinal cohort of adult patients treated for traumatic orthopaedic injuries that were neither life- nor limb-threatening between January 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021. A rapid multidisciplinary review termed a “surgical pause” (SP) was available to those who were ≥80 years old, were nonambulatory or had minimal ambulation at baseline, and/or resided in a skilled nursing facility, as well as upon clinician request. Metrics analyzed include the proportion and quality of goals-of-care documentation, rate of return to the hospital, complications, length of stay, and mortality. Statistical analysis utilized the Kruskal-Wallis rank and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and the likelihood-ratio chi-square test for categorical variables. Results:. A total of 133 patients were either eligible for the SP or referred by a clinician. Compared with SP-eligible patients who did not undergo an SP, patients who underwent an SP more frequently had goals-of-care notes identified (92.4% versus 75.0%, p = 0.014) and recorded in the appropriate location (71.2% versus 27.5%, p 0.08 for all). Conclusions:. The pilot program indicated that an SP is a feasible and effective means of increasing the quality and frequency of goals-of-care documentation in high-risk operative candidates whose traumatic orthopaedic injuries are neither life- nor limb-threatening. This multidisciplinary program aims for goal-concordant treatment plans that minimize modifiable perioperative risks. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.