Frontiers in Oncology (Jun 2024)

Comparison of 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 for 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy patient selection

  • Surekha Yadav,
  • Sarasa T. Kim,
  • Abuzar Moradi Tuchayi,
  • Fei Jiang,
  • Amanda Morley,
  • Rachelle Saelee,
  • Yingbing Wang,
  • Roxanna Juarez,
  • Courtney Lawnh-Heath,
  • Vadim S. Koshkin,
  • Vadim S. Koshkin,
  • Thomas A. Hope,
  • Thomas A. Hope,
  • Thomas A. Hope

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1382582
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

Purpose68Ga-PSMA-11 is recommended for the selection of patients for treatment in the package insert for 177Lu-PSMA-617. We aimed to compare imaging properties and post-treatment outcomes from radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients selected with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 80 patients undergoing PSMA RLT, who had pretreatment imaging using either 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL. For both groups, we compared the biodistribution and lesion uptake and the PSA response to treatment.ResultsBoth agents had comparable biodistribution. Patients initially imaged with 18F-DCFPyL had a higher PSA response (66% vs. 42%), and more patients had a PSA50 response (72% vs. 43%) compared to patients imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11.Conclusion18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 had comparable biodistribution and lesion uptake. Patients imaged with 18F-DCFPyL demonstrated clinical benefit to PSMA RLT comparable to those imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11, and either agent can be used for screening patients.

Keywords