Favorable outcome of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment than surgery‐first in female HR‐positive/HER2‐negative breast cancer patients—A NCDB analysis (2010–2016)

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in female HR‐positive/HER2‐negative breast cancer patients. Data and Methods We identified female patients aged ≥18 years with cT1‐4N0‐XM0, HR(+), and HER2(−) breast cancer from the National Cancer Database. The patients who underwent surgery first were categorized as “surgery‐first,” while those who received NET before surgery were classified as “NET.” Propensity score‐matching, Cox proportional‐hazard model, variance inflation factors, and interaction analysis were employed to estimate the correlation between NET and survival outcomes. Results Among 432,387 cases, 2914 NET patients and 2914 surgery‐first patients were matched. Compared with the surgery‐first group, the NET group received less adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the NET group exhibited higher survival probabilities compared with the surgery‐first group (3 years: 91.4% vs. 82.1%; 5 years: 82.1% vs. 66.8%). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that NET was associated with improved OS (surgery‐first vs. NET: HR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.93–2.44). Age over 55 years old, having public insurance, higher CDCC score, higher NSBR grade, ER(+)PR(−), and advanced clinical stage were related to worse OS (all p < 0.05). There was an interaction between age, race, income, and home and treatment regimen (all p < 0.05). Conclusion NET may be a more effective treatment procedure than surgery‐first in female HR‐positive/HER2‐negative, non‐metastatic breast cancer patients. Future clinical studies with more detailed data will provide higher‐level evidence‐based data.

Keywords

• HR‐positive/HER2‐negative breast cancer
• National Cancer Database
• neoadjuvant endocrine treatment
• overall survival
• surgery