Professional nurses’ perceptions regarding the implementation of perinatal Problem Identification Programme in a public hospital in the Bojanala District, Northwest Province

Abstract

Background: Appropriate implementation of solutions emanating from the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme (PPIP) improves the quality of perinatal care, leading to the reduction of perinatal morbidity and mortality rates due to avoidable factors. Effective implementation of the Perinatal Problem Identification Programme necessitates a comprehensive approach that includes both the perinatal period (from 22 weeks of gestation to 28 days after birth) and neonatal period (from birth to 28 days after birth), as these critical periods are vital for identifying and addressing potential health issues in pregnant women and newborn. Purpose: The study sought to investigate the perceptions of professional nurses regarding the implementation of PPIP in a public hospital in the Bojanala District, Northwest Province in South Africa. Methods: Professional nurses participated in the exploratory, descriptive, and contextual qualitative study. Data were collected using three focus group interviews. Data were transcribed and analysed using Tesch’s method of data analysis. Trustworthy and ethical considerations were maintained throughout the study. Results: The following themes emerged from the analysed data: inadequate commitment of operational managers, inconsistent attendance of perinatal audit meetings, and a lack of institutional support and established interprofessional teams to drive the implementation of PPIP.ContributionThe benefits of PPIP implementation may prevent avoidable factors, missed opportunities, and substandard care, to contribute to reducing perinatal mortality and morbidity rates.

Keywords

• Implementation
• Perceptions
• Perinatal Problem Identification Programme