Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Oct 2023)

Analysis of immortal-time effect in post-infarction ventricular septal defect

  • Héctor González-Pacheco,
  • Jorge Arturo Ortega-Hernandez,
  • Jesús Ángel Meza-López,
  • Luis Alejandro Soliz-Uriona,
  • Daniel Manzur-Sandoval,
  • Rodrigo Gopar-Nieto,
  • Diego Araiza-Garaygordobil,
  • Daniel Sierra-Lara,
  • Eduardo Arias-Sánchez,
  • Juan Pablo Sandoval,
  • Alfredo Altamirano-Castillo,
  • Salvador Mendoza-García,
  • Arturo Arzate-Ramírez,
  • Francisco Martin Baranda-Tovar,
  • Humberto Martinez,
  • Álvaro Montañez-Orozco,
  • Luis Augusto Baeza-Herrera,
  • Alejandro Sierra-González De Cossio,
  • Alexandra Arias-Mendoza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1270608
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionTime-fixed analyses have traditionally been utilized to examine outcomes in post-infarction ventricular septal defect (VSD). The aims of this study were to: (1) analyze the relationship between VSD closure/non-closure and mortality; (2) assess the presence of immortal-time bias.Material and methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by VSD. Time-fixed and time-dependent Cox regression methodologies were employed.ResultsThe study included 80 patients: surgical closure (n = 26), transcatheter closure (n = 20), or conservative management alone (n = 34). At presentation, patients without VSD closure exhibited high-risk clinical characteristics, had the shortest median time intervals from STEMI onset to VSD development (4.0, 4.0, and 2.0 days, respectively; P = 0.03) and from STEMI symptom onset to hospital arrival (6.0, 5.0, and 0.8 days, respectively; P < 0.0001). The median time from STEMI onset to closure was 22.0 days (P = 0.14). In-hospital mortality rate was higher among patients who did not undergo defect closure (50%, 35%, and 88.2%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Closure of the defect using a fixed-time method was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (HR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.31, P < 0.0001, and HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04–0.36, P < 0.0001, for surgery and transcatheter closure, respectively). However, when employing a time-varying method, this association was not observed (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.45–1.98, P = 0.90, and HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.41–1.87, P = 0.74, for surgery and transcatheter closure, respectively). These findings suggest the presence of an immortal-time bias.ConclusionsThis study highlights that using a fixed-time analytic approach in post-infarction VSD can result in immortal-time bias. Researchers should consider employing time-dependent methodologies.

Keywords