Annals of Global Health (Jul 2018)

State of Children Environmental Health Research in Latin America

  • Lizbeth López-Carrillo,
  • Leonel González-González,
  • Maricela Piña-Pozas,
  • Ángel Mérida-Ortega,
  • Brenda Gamboa-Loira,
  • Julia Blanco-Muñoz,
  • Luisa E. Torres-Sánchez,
  • Magali Hurtado-Díaz,
  • Marlene Cortez-Lugo,
  • Germán Guerra,
  • Nelly Salgado de Snyder,
  • Mariano E. Cebrian

DOI
https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.908
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 84, no. 2
pp. 204 – 211

Abstract

Read online

Background: Promotion of biomedical research along with the development of evidence-based prevention policies have been suggested as an effective way to reduce environmental risks for children’s health in Latin America. However, there is little information on the current state of childhood environmental health research, which might help identify its strengths and limitations, as well as to design a strategy to improve the future of child environmental health research in the region. Objective: To describe the current state of environmental health research on children exposed to environmental pollutants in Latin America. Methodology: We performed a comprehensive search of published peer-reviewed environmental health articles (1994–2014), dealing with the exposure of Latin American children to chemical compounds. We described the type of studies and their research topics, and identified networks of co-authors. We also analyzed the relationship between research funding sources and the impact factor (IF) of the journal where research was published. Results: The average number of publications was about 20 per year. Mexico and Brazil produced almost 70% of the 409 identified papers. The most studied contaminant was lead, but research on this element has declined since 2005. Retrospective studies were the most frequent, and also showed a decreasing trend. Most studies did not assess health effects. Four groups of leading investigators and two collaboration models for scientific production were identified. Except for Mexico, there was very little collaboration with North American and European countries. Compared to articles that did not report financial support, those that received international funding had on average an IF around 7, and those with national funding reached a mean IF near 3. Conclusion: There is a limited number of publications and insufficient collaboration between Latin-American scientists. It is necessary to identify strategies to stimulate South-South-North alliances and strengthen the scarce research on the environmental health of children in the region.