The Scientific World Journal (Jan 2014)

Double Barreled Wet Colostomy: Initial Experience and Literature Review

  • Luis Salgado-Cruz,
  • Eloy Espin-Basany,
  • Francesc Vallribera-Valls,
  • Jose Sanchez-Garcia,
  • Luis Miguel Jimenez-Gomez,
  • Marc Marti-Gallostra,
  • Ana Garza-Maldonado

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/961409
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2014

Abstract

Read online

Background. Pelvic exenteration and multivisceral resection in colorectal have been described as a curative and palliative intervention. Urinary tract reconstruction in a pelvic exenteration is achieved in most cases with an ileal conduit of Bricker, although different urinary reservoirs have been described. Methods. A retrospective and observational study of six patients who underwent a pelvic exenteration and urinary tract reconstruction with a double barreled wet colostomy (DBWC) was done, describing the preoperative diagnosis, the indication for the pelvic exenteration, the complications associated with the procedure, and the followup in a period of 5 years. A literature review of the case series reported of the technique was performed. Results. Six patients had a urinary tract reconstruction with the DBWC technique, 5 male patients and one female patient. Age range was from 20 to 77 years, with a medium age 53.6 years. The most frequent complication presented was a pelvic abscess in 3 patients (42.85%); all complications could be resolved with a conservative treatment. Conclusion. In the group of our patients with pelvic exenteration and urinary tract reconstruction with a DBWC, it is a safe procedure and well tolerated by the patients, and most of the complications can be resolved with conservative treatment.