African Journal of Laboratory Medicine (Apr 2017)

Performance evaluation of tuberculosis smear microscopists working at rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia

  • Habtamu Asrat,
  • Abebaw Kebede,
  • Abnet Abebe,
  • Abyot Meaza,
  • Getinet Hailu,
  • Adinew Desale,
  • Andargachew Gashu,
  • Wondwossen Kassa,
  • Tesfaye Mekonnen,
  • Ebisea Abose,
  • Feven Girmachew,
  • Dereje Yenealem,
  • Achamyeleh Mulugeta,
  • Gonfa Ayana,
  • Kassu Desta

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v6i1.590
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
pp. e1 – e6

Abstract

Read online

Background: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease caused by the bacillus Mycobacterium tuberculosis. According to the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health’s 2013–2014 report, the tuberculosis case detection rate was 53.7%, which was below the target of 81% set for that year. Objective: This study assessed the performance of tuberculosis smear microscopists at external quality assessment rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at 81 laboratories from April to July 2015. Panel slides were prepared and validated at the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory. The validated panel slides were used to evaluate the performance of microscopists at these laboratories compared with readers from the reference laboratory. Results: A total of 389 external quality assessment rechecking laboratory microscopists participated in the study, of which 268 (68.9%) worked at hospitals, 241 (62%) had more than five years of work experience, 201 (51.7%) held Bachelors degrees, and 319 (82%) reported tuberculosis smear microscopy training. Overall, 324 (83.3%) participants scored ≥ 80%. Sensitivity for detecting tuberculosis bacilli was 84.5% and specificity was 93.1%. The overall percent agreement between participants and reference readers was 87.1 (kappa=0.72). All 10 slides were correctly read (i.e., scored 100%) by 80 (20.6%) participants, 156 (40.1%) scored 90% – 95%, 88 (22.6%) scored 80% – 85% and 65 (16.7%) scored below 80%. There were 806 (20.7%) total errors, with 143 (3.7%) major and 663 (17%) minor errors. Conclusion: The overall performance of participants in reading the slides showed good agreement with the reference readers. Most errors were minor, and the ability to detect tuberculosis bacilli can be improved through building the capacity of professionals.

Keywords