Comparison of DNA extraction methods for genotyping equine histidine-rich glycoprotein insertion/deletion polymorphisms using oral mucosa swabs and feces

Abstract

Previously, we demonstrated unique insertion/deletion polymorphisms of equine histidine-rich glycoprotein (eHRG) with five genotypes composed of 45-bp or 90-bp deletions in the histidine-rich region of eHRG in Thoroughbred horses. Although leukocytes are typically used to collect DNA for genotyping, blood sampling from animals is sometimes difficult and invasive. Moreover, the method for extracting DNA from blood leukocytes involves complicated steps and must be performed soon after blood sampling for sensitive gene analysis. In the present study, we performed eHRG genotyping using DNA, isolated from oral mucosa swabs collected by rubbing the mucosa on the underside of the upper lip of horses and 100 mg of freshly excreted feces obtained by scraping their surface. In the present study, we performed eHRG genotyping using DNA isolated from oral mucosa swabs and feces of horses (18 Thoroughbreds, 17 mixed breeds, 2 warm bloods), and compared the accuracy of this method with that of the method using DNA from leukocytes. The DNA derived from oral mucosa swabs was sufficient in quantity and quality for eHRG genotyping. However, DNA derived from fecal samples requires a more sensitive detection system because of contamination with non-horse DNA, and the test quality is low. Collection of oral mucosa swabs is less invasive than blood sampling; further, oral swabs can be stored for a longer period in a specified high-quality solution. Therefore, collecting DNA samples from oral mucosa swabs is recommended for the genetic analysis of not only horses but also other animals that are not accustomed to humans.

Keywords

• Horses
• DNA recovery
• Histidine-rich glycoprotein
• Genotyping
• Animal welfare