PeerJ (Dec 2023)
Reliability of five-minute vs. one-hour heart rate variability metrics in individuals with spinal cord injury
Abstract
Background A previous study showed low reliability of 1-h HRV outcomes in participants with spinal cord injury (SCI), but it was not certain whether the low reliability was due to the unrestricted activity of participants. We aimed to investigate test-retest reliability of HRV metrics in individuals with SCI using a 1-h measurement in a supine position. Methods Individuals with SCI underwent two sessions of 1-h recording of the time between consecutive R waves (RR-intervals) in a supine position. HRV outcomes were obtained from a single 5-min data segment and for the full 1-h recording. HRV parameters of interest were: standard deviation of all normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and square root of the mean of the squared differences between successive R-R intervals (RMSSD) (time domain); and high frequency power (HF), low frequency power (LF), very low frequency power (VLF), ultra-low frequency power (ULF) and total power (TP) (frequency domain). Relative reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Absolute reliability was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA). Results Data from 37 individuals (14 with tetraplegia and 23 with paraplegia) were included. Relative reliability was higher for the 1-h (ICCs ranged from 0.13–0.71) than for the 5-min duration (ICCs ranged from 0.06–0.50) in the overall SCI group for all HRV metrics. Participants with tetraplegia had lower relative reliability compared to participants with paraplegia in all HRV metrics for the 5-min duration (ICCs ranged from −0.01–0.34 vs. 0.21–0.57). For the 1-h duration, participants with paraplegia showed higher relative reliability than participants with tetraplegia in all HRV metrics (ICCs ranged from 0.18–0.79 vs. 0.07–0.54) except TP (ICC 0.69 vs. 0.82). In terms of absolute reliability, the CVs and LoAs for the 1-h duration were better than for the 5-min duration. In general, time domain metrics showed better reliability than frequency domain metrics for both durations in participants with tetraplegia and paraplegia. The lowest CV and narrowest 95% LoA were found for SDNN in 5-min and 1-h durations overall and in both lesion levels. Conclusions The supine position did not provide better reliability compared to unrestricted activity in participants with SCI. HRV analysis using a 5-min duration is of limited value in SCI due to poor reliability. For the 1-h analysis duration, interpretation of the reliability of HRV varies according to lesion level: it is recommended to take lesion level into account when interpreting reliability measures.
Keywords
