Annals of Saudi Medicine (Sep 2013)

Pathological responses and long-term outcome analysis after neoadjuvant chemotheraphy in breast cancer patients from Kuwait over a period of 15 years

  • Yamini Krishnan,
  • Shafika A. Alawadhi,
  • Sreedharan P.S.,
  • Murali Gopal,
  • Sanjay Thuruthel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2013.443
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33, no. 5
pp. 443 – 450

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The attainment of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been taken as a surrogate marker for disease-free survival and overall survival. This is however dependent on various other parameters such as stage, grade, and biologic markers. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: This is a retrospective study of 365 patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Kuwait Cancer Control Centre between 1998 and 2009. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 365 breast cancer patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 1998–2009 were analyzed for the relationship of pCR with hormone status, Her2 status, histopathological subtype. Survival analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Hormone receptor (HR) negative tumors had a higher pCR as against HR positive tumors, and the highest pCR in our analysis of pathological subtypes were seen in the HR+, Her2neu + and HR−, Her2neu + group. In our study, we could make out the paradoxes that well differentiated, and HR positive tumors had a better survival in spite of having lower pCR. The luminal A subtype also had a better overall survival than the triple negative subtype in spite of having lower pCR with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Though the achievement of pCR retains its significance, it is more prognostic in HR negative tumors. The importance of HR receptor status, grade, and histopathological subtype in the long-term survival has been emphasized.