Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (Oct 2024)

Mechanism exploration and model construction for small cell transformation in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas

  • Yan Li,
  • Tongji Xie,
  • Shouzheng Wang,
  • Lin Yang,
  • Xuezhi Hao,
  • Yan Wang,
  • Xingsheng Hu,
  • Lin Wang,
  • Junling Li,
  • Jianming Ying,
  • Puyuan Xing

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01981-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation accounts for 3–14% of resistance in EGFR-TKI relapsed lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), with unknown molecular mechanisms and optimal treatment strategies. We performed transcriptomic analyses (including bulk and spatial transcriptomics) and multiplex immunofluorescence on pre-treated samples from LUADs without transformation after EGFR-TKI treatment (LUAD-NT), primary SCLCs (SCLC-P) and LUADs with transformation after EGFR-TKI treatment (before transformation: LUAD-BT; after transformation: SCLC-AT). Our study found that LUAD-BT exhibited potential transcriptomic characteristics for transformation compared with LUAD-NT. We identified several pathways that shifted during transformation, and the transformation might be promoted by epigenetic alterations (such as HDAC10, HDAC1, DNMT3A) within the tumor cells instead of within the tumor microenvironment. For druggable pathways, transformed-SCLC were proved to be less dependent on EGF signaling but more relied on FGF signaling, while VEGF-VEGFR pathway remained active, indicating potential treatments after transformation. We also found transformed-SCLC showed an immuno-exhausted status which was associated with the duration of EGFR-TKI before transformation. Besides, SCLC-AT exhibited distinct molecular subtypes from SCLC-P. Moreover, we constructed an ideal 4-marker model based on transcriptomic and IHC data to predict SCLC transformation, which obtained a sensitivity of 100% and 87.5%, a specificity of 95.7% and 100% in the training and test cohorts, respectively. We provided insights into the molecular mechanisms of SCLC transformation and the differences between SCLC-AT and SCLC-P, which might shed light on prevention strategies and subsequent therapeutic strategies for SCLC transformation in the future.