Continence (Dec 2023)
Current surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence — Workup, options and decision making
Abstract
This article gives a current overview of surgical options and limits of surgical post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) therapy and reflects the contents of workshop 6 at the ICS meeting in Vienna, Austria 2022.The decision-making process in PPI requires consideration of various dimensions from presentation to determination of treatment. Patient factors include the severity of symptoms, age and health condition, comorbidities, and patient’s expectations. Also important are the type of prior prostate surgery, radiation therapy, and status of cure.Only an accurate diagnosis will lead to the most effective management option being chosen. An accurate history, standardized questionnaires, physical examination, and 24-hour pad-weights are essential. Transperineal ultrasound, urethrocystoscopy with a urethral repositioning test, and multichannel urodynamics are useful in assessing sphincter and bladder function, as well as the anastomotic region after radical prostatectomy.The effect of various treatment options, such as slings, balloons, and artificial hydraulic sphincters can now be evaluated with long-term studies. The most widely used type of sling is the two-arm fixed sling with a dry rate of 58% and overall improvement rate of 83% at 5 years. Prior pelvic irradiation may reduce the long-term success rate. Adjustable devices offer the opportunity of adaptation to a potentially changing degree of incontinence to meet individual patients’ needs. Adjustable male slings support the bulbar urethra with a minimal increase of urethral resistanceThe artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the most predictably reliable treatment for men with moderate to severe stress incontinence with social continence rates of 79%. Device revision is required for recurrent incontinence with options including cuff repositioning, downsizing, or transcorporal cuff placement. Alternative hydraulic sphincter systems offer the possibility of postoperative adjustment by changing the intra-device pressure. Recent developments include electrical and remotely controlled devices not yet commercially available. Further factors of the decision-making process are the skills of the surgeon, individual preferences, and product availability.
