Italian Journal of Animal Science (Dec 2024)

Environmental impact of Italian pig herds as affected by farm management factors

  • Marco Berton,
  • Enrico Sturaro,
  • Alessio Cecchinato,
  • Stefano Schiavon,
  • Luigi Gallo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2024.2302826
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 164 – 178

Abstract

Read online

This study aimed at evaluating the environmental impact (EI) of herds representative of the Italian heavy pig production system to investigate the EI variation associated with farm management (FM), diet formulation (DF) and animal response (AR) variables. Data originated from 8 breeding farms, which included the sows and preweaning piglets (Site1) and the post-weaned piglets (7.5–30 kg body weight – BW, Site2) and 10 growing–fattening farms, dealing with 30–170 kg BW pigs (Site3). A cradle-to-farm gate Life Cycle Assessment was used, with 1 kg BW gain (BWG) as functional unit. Impact categories were global warming (GWP), acidification (AP) and eutrophication (EP) potentials and land occupation (LO). Whole-production cycle EI (Site123, 0–170 kg BW) was obtained summing up EIs of 0–30 and 30–170 kg BW animals. Impacts were analysed with one- or two-way PERMANOVA to test the effect of FM, DF and AR variables. The Site123-related EI averaged nearly 3.1 kg CO2-eq (GWP), 50 g SO2-eq (AP), 22 g PO4-eq (EP) and 4.9 m2/y (LO) per kg BWG. Site3 contributed nearly 80% of the whole impact. Regarding Site1, GWP resulted mitigated by increasing sow productivity. Site2 EI resulted mitigated by decreasing feed conversion ratio and increasing average daily gain, whereas Site3 EI by increasing feed self-sufficiency and decreasing dietary crude protein and mortality. In perspective, given the relevance of Site3 on the whole-pig system EI, a deeper integration between the farm agronomical management and the growing–finishing pigs’ diets formulation would support the environmental sustainability of heavy pig operations.

Keywords