HemaSphere (Aug 2023)

Application of IPSET-thrombosis in 1366 Patients Prospectively Followed From the Spanish Registry of Essential Thrombocythemia

  • Alberto Alvarez-Larrán,
  • Beatriz Cuevas,
  • Patricia Velez,
  • Soledad Noya,
  • Gonzalo Caballero-Navarro,
  • Francisca Ferrer-Marín,
  • Sara Carbonell,
  • Manuel Pérez-Encinas,
  • María Teresa Gómez-Casares,
  • Raúl Pérez-López,
  • Elena Magro,
  • Ana Moretó,
  • Irene Pastor-Galán,
  • Anna Angona,
  • María Isabel Mata-Vázquez,
  • Lucía Guerrero-Fernández,
  • José María Guerra,
  • Gonzalo Carreño-Tarragona,
  • Laura Fox,
  • Ilda Murillo,
  • Valentín García-Gutiérrez,
  • Elvira Mora,
  • Ruth Stuckey,
  • Eduardo Arellano-Rodrigo,
  • Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda,
  • Arturo Pereira,
  • On behalf of the MPN Spanish Group (GEMFIN)*

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000936
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 8
p. e936

Abstract

Read online

The International Prognostic Score of thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythemia (IPSET-thrombosis) and its revised version have been proposed to guide thrombosis prevention strategies. We evaluated both classifications to prognosticate thrombosis in 1366 contemporary essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients prospectively followed from the Spanish Registry of ET. The cumulative incidence of thrombosis at 10 years, taking death as a competing risk, was 11.4%. The risk of thrombosis was significantly higher in the high-risk IPSET-thrombosis and high-risk revised IPSET-thrombosis, but no differences were observed among the lower risk categories. Patients allocated in high-risk IPSET-thrombosis (subdistribution hazard ratios [SHR], 3.7 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.6-8.7]) and high-risk revised IPSET-thrombosis (SHR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.4-7.45]) showed an increased risk of arterial thrombosis, whereas both scoring systems failed to predict venous thrombosis. The incidence rate of thrombosis in intermediate risk revised IPSET-thrombosis (aged >60 years, JAK2-negative, and no history of thrombosis) was very low regardless of the treatment administered (0.9% and 0% per year with and without cytoreduction, respectively). Dynamic application of the revised IPSET-thrombosis showed a low rate of thrombosis when patients without history of prior thrombosis switched to a higher risk category after reaching 60 years of age. In conclusion, IPSET-thrombosis scores are useful for identifying patients at high risk of arterial thrombosis, whereas they fail to predict venous thrombosis. Controlled studies are needed to determine the appropriate treatment of ET patients assigned to the non-high-risk categories.