Adapting attribution science to the climate extremes of tomorrow

Abstract

Increasing risks of extreme weather events are the most noticeable and damaging manifestation of anthropogenic climate change. In the aftermath of an extreme event, policymakers are often called upon to make timely and sensitive decisions about rebuilding and managing present and future risks. Information regarding whether, where, and how present day and future risks are changing is needed to adequately inform these decisions. But this information is often not available on the temporal and spatial scales decisions are made. In particular, decision makers require information about both historical changes and plausible future changes in the severity and frequency of extreme weather in a seamless way. However, applying the same methods from event attribution to future projections by defining events based on present day frequency of occurrence leads to potentially misleading estimates of future changes in a warmer climate. We demonstrate that this is fundamentally a consequence of risk ratios saturating at different values. This study investigates the circumstances under which present-day attribution frameworks become ill-suited for characterising changes in future extremes, before discussing what alternative frameworks may be more useful to inform stakeholders about what additional risks from extreme weather events will emerge in a warmer world.

Keywords

• climate change
• attribution
• extreme events
• future projections
• saturation
• adaptation