Diagnostic Performance of Cytocolposcopy versus Biopsy for Premalignant and Malignant Lesions in a Women's Hospital Dysplasia Clinic

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CRC) is a public health problem because it is the fourth most common gynecologic neoplasm worldwide. The screening tests used to diagnose this pathology are cervical cytology, which in suspected malignancy or with malignancy requires colposcopy to identify the affected area and thus guide the biopsy, which is the gold standard for diagnosis. Therefore, these tests are complementary, and a high diagnostic concordance is required to make a confident diagnosis. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, observational, and analytical study was performed. A total of 1470 medical records were analyzed, of which 175 patients met the inclusion criteria. The cyto-colposcopic diagnostic yield was compared with the histopathologic yield. The concordance between screening tests and the gold standard was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient Results: The sample comprised 175 subjects who met the selection criteria (11.9%). The mean age was 34.59 + 11.01 years, ranging from 17 to 65 years. The mean sexual debut was 16.6 years, with a mean of 3.1 ± 2 sexual partners. When patients were classified according to lesion type, the highest percentages were found in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). With 45.71, 61.14, and 49.14% for cytologic, colposcopic, and histopathologic examination, respectively. The highest concordance between histopathology and cytology was found in the high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) with 0.41, and the concordance between histopathology and colposcopy in HSIL and cancer was 0.55 and 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: Papanicolaou tests and colposcopy showed moderate concordance with histopathologic findings; the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy is superior to that of cytology.

Keywords

• Cytocolposcopy test
• Biopsy
• Premalignant Lesions
• Malignant Lesions
• diagnostic